Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Hacksaw Gaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 8,594× against 10,000×, with Le Hooligan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Flock Me does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Flock Me is Cluster pays, Sails of Riches is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.20% — Sails of Riches is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 8,594× against 10,000×, with Sails of Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Flock Me does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)