Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Flock Me
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 8,594×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Flock Me vs Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.03%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 8,594× against 10,000×, with Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Flock Me does not publish a rating.
Flock Me vs Le Hooligan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.00% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 8,594× against 10,000×, with Le Hooligan higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Flock Me does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
