Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Flowers

NetEnt

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.32%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
5
Theme signals
Not published
VS

Heavenly Elephant Fortune

Microgaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.27%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
5
Theme signals
East Asia, Animals, Wealth
Free demo available →
VS

Nitro Nights

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.31%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
15,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Flowers vs Heavenly Elephant Fortune

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.32% against 96.27%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Flowers does not publish a rating.

Flowers vs Nitro Nights

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.32% against 96.31%.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Flowers does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)