Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Hacksaw Gaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.41% — Le Football Fan is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 3,300× against 2,500×, with Funk Master™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Funk Master™ does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Football Fan returns more in theory over the long run, while Funk Master™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Funk Master™ is Cluster pays, Gigantoonz is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.25% — Gigantoonz is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,300× against 4,000×, with Gigantoonz higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Funk Master™ does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)