Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Funk Master™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,300×
- Reels
- 8
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Red Hot Luck
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Whale Rush
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Funk Master™ vs Red Hot Luck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.08%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 3,300× against 5,000×, with Red Hot Luck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Funk Master™ does not publish a rating.
Funk Master™ vs Whale Rush
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.04%.
- Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 3,300× against 10,000×, with Whale Rush higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Funk Master™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
