Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.08%.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 3,300× against 5,000×, with Red Hot Luck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Funk Master™ does not publish a rating.

Different format families: Funk Master™ is Cluster pays, Gigantoonz is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.04% against 96.25% — Gigantoonz is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,300× against 4,000×, with Gigantoonz higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Funk Master™ does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)