Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gem Crush™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,361×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Gonzo's Gold
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.11%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,484×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
DJ Psycho
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,420×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gem Crush™ vs Gonzo's Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.13% against 96.11%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,361× against 3,484×, with Gem Crush™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gem Crush™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Gem Crush™ vs DJ Psycho
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.13% against 96.05% — Gem Crush™ is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.8×: 4,361× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gem Crush™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gem Crush™ returns more in theory over the long run, while DJ Psycho reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
