Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Ghost Pirates™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Horror
VS
Temple of Nudges™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Ghost Pirates™ vs Temple of Nudges™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.03% — Ghost Pirates™ is 0.85 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 1,000× against 600×, with Ghost Pirates™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ghost Pirates™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Ghost Pirates™ vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ghost Pirates™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
