Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Ghost Pirates™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Horror
VS
Zombie Carnival
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Pixies vs Pirates
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,907×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Ghost Pirates™ vs Zombie Carnival
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.50% — Ghost Pirates™ is 0.38 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.0×: 1,000× against 5,000×, with Zombie Carnival higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ghost Pirates™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ghost Pirates™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Zombie Carnival reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Ghost Pirates™ vs Pixies vs Pirates
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 95.91% — Ghost Pirates™ is 0.97 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 11.9×: 1,000× against 11,907×, with Pixies vs Pirates higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ghost Pirates™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ghost Pirates™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Pixies vs Pirates reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
