Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Go Bananas!™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Leprechaun goes Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Pixie Wings
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.67%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Go Bananas!™ vs Leprechaun goes Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.91% against 96.75% — Go Bananas!™ is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Go Bananas!™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Go Bananas!™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Leprechaun goes Egypt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Go Bananas!™ vs Pixie Wings
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.91% against 96.67% — Go Bananas!™ is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Go Bananas!™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Go Bananas!™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Pixie Wings reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
