Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gonzo's Gold
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.11%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,484×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Gem Crush™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,361×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gonzo's Gold vs Gem Crush™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.11% against 96.13%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 3,484× against 4,361×, with Gem Crush™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gonzo's Gold does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Gonzo's Gold vs Le Football Fan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.11% against 96.41% — Le Football Fan is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 3,484× against 2,500×, with Gonzo's Gold higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gonzo's Gold does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Le Football Fan returns more in theory over the long run, while Gonzo's Gold reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
