Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gorilla Kingdom™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
RAGE
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
3rd Base
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,114×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gorilla Kingdom™ vs RAGE
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.03% against 96.08%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,700× and 1,800×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gorilla Kingdom™ does not publish a rating.
Gorilla Kingdom™ vs 3rd Base
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.29% — 3rd Base is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,700× against 2,114×, with 3rd Base higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Gorilla Kingdom™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
