Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Grand Spinn™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,200×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Fruit Blaze
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Horse's Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Grand Spinn™ vs Fruit Blaze
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.19% against 96.01% — Grand Spinn™ is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 5,200× against 4,000×, with Grand Spinn™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Grand Spinn™ does not publish a rating.
Grand Spinn™ vs Horse's Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Horse's Treasures does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Grand Spinn™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
