Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Halloween Jack™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Banquet of Dead
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 7,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Frankenstein
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Halloween Jack™ vs Banquet of Dead
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.20% — Halloween Jack™ is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 7,100× and 7,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Halloween Jack™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Halloween Jack™ vs Frankenstein
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.19% — Halloween Jack™ is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Halloween Jack™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Horror.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
