Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Hotline 2™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Running Sushi
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Good Old 7’s™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,348×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Hotline 2™ vs Running Sushi
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,500× against 3,000×, with Hotline 2™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hotline 2™ does not publish a rating.
Hotline 2™ vs Good Old 7’s™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.10%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,500× and 3,348×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hotline 2™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Good Old 7’s™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Hotline 2™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
