Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jack and the Beanstalk™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,100×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Heavenly Elephant Fortune
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.27%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.28% against 96.27%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 7,100× against 10,000×, with Heavenly Elephant Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack and the Beanstalk™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jack and the Beanstalk™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Heavenly Elephant Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
