Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jack Hammer
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.96%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Dazzle Me
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Galaxy Babies
Habanero
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,575×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jack Hammer vs Dazzle Me
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.96% against 96.91%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 700× and 700×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jack Hammer returns more in theory over the long run, while Dazzle Me reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Jack Hammer vs Galaxy Babies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Galaxy Babies does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 700× against 1,575×, with Galaxy Babies higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
