Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jack Hammer
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.96%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jolly Roger
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 928×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Dazzle Me
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jack Hammer vs Jolly Roger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.96% against 97.00%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 700× against 928×, with Jolly Roger higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer does not publish a rating.
Jack Hammer vs Dazzle Me
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.96% against 96.91%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 700× and 700×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jack Hammer returns more in theory over the long run, while Dazzle Me reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
