Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.07% against 96.94% — Jack Hammer 2: Fishy Business is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 2: Fishy Business does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.07% against 97.00% — Jack Hammer 2: Fishy Business is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 800× against 928×, with Jolly Roger higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 2: Fishy Business does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jack Hammer 2: Fishy Business returns more in theory over the long run, while Jolly Roger reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)