Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Animals
VS
Crab Trap
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,100×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair vs Crab Trap
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.07%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,300× against 1,100×, with Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair vs Dandy Diamonds
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Dandy Diamonds does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
