Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair
NetEnt
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Animals
VS
Immortal Fruits
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,787×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.06%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 1,300× against 2,787×, with Immortal Fruits higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jack Hammer 3: Diamond Affair returns more in theory over the long run, while Immortal Fruits reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
