Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon
NetEnt
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Le Hooligan
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.34%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mighty Panda
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon vs Le Hooligan
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon does not publish a rating.
Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon vs Mighty Panda
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Mighty Panda does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack Hammer 4: Chasing the Dragon does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
