Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jelly Belly Megaways™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Mermaid's Diamond
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.50% — Mermaid's Diamond is 0.42 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.0×: 20,000× against 5,000×, with Jelly Belly Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jelly Belly Megaways™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mermaid's Diamond returns more in theory over the long run, while Jelly Belly Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
