Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jumanji
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.33%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Doom of Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Santa vs Rudolf
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.35%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jumanji vs Doom of Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.33% against 96.21% — Jumanji is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jumanji does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jumanji returns more in theory over the long run, while Doom of Egypt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Jumanji vs Santa vs Rudolf
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.33% against 96.35%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jumanji does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
