Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Microgaming

Habanero

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.65% — King of 3 Kingdoms is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility cannot be compared: King of 3 Kingdoms does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.88% against 86.00% — King of 3 Kingdoms is 10.88 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 1,000× against 1,130×, with Knockout Football higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: King of 3 Kingdoms does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. King of 3 Kingdoms returns more in theory over the long run, while Knockout Football reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)