Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
King of 3 Kingdoms
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Ghost Pirates™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Horror
VS
Thunderstruck II
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
King of 3 Kingdoms vs Ghost Pirates™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.88% against 96.88%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: King of 3 Kingdoms does not publish a rating.
King of 3 Kingdoms vs Thunderstruck II
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.65% — King of 3 Kingdoms is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility cannot be compared: King of 3 Kingdoms does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
