Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
King of 3 Kingdoms
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.88%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jade Butterfly
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.88% against 96.47% — King of 3 Kingdoms is 0.41 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 1,000× against 1,400×, with Jade Butterfly higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: King of 3 Kingdoms does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. King of 3 Kingdoms returns more in theory over the long run, while Jade Butterfly reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
