Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Koi Princess™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Koi Princess™ vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Koi Princess™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Koi Princess™ vs Magic Piggy OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.23% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 1,500× against 2,500×, with Magic Piggy OG higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Koi Princess™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Koi Princess™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Magic Piggy OG reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
