Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Leprechaun Joy
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,255×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Frankenstein
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Trollpot 5000™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Leprechaun Joy vs Frankenstein
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.19%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Leprechaun Joy does not publish a rating.
Leprechaun Joy vs Trollpot 5000™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.19%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,255× and 5,200×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Leprechaun Joy does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Trollpot 5000™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Leprechaun Joy reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
