Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lights™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Adventure Palace
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Adventure
VS
Starburst™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lights™ vs Adventure Palace
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.10% against 96.10%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lights™ does not publish a rating.
Lights™ vs Starburst™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.10% against 96.08%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 600× against 800×, with Starburst™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lights™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lights™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Starburst™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
