Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lights™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Gold Train
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lights™ vs Gold Train
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.17% — Gold Train is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 600× and 600×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lights™ does not publish a rating.
Lights™ vs Magic Piggy OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.10% against 96.20% — Magic Piggy OG is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.2×: 600× against 2,500×, with Magic Piggy OG higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lights™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
