Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Habanero

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Habanero — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
RTP cannot be compared: Galaxy Babies does not publish one.
Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 700× against 1,575×, with Galaxy Babies higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Long Pao™ does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.96% against 96.65% — Long Pao™ is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 14.3×: 700× against 10,000×, with Riches of Robin higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Long Pao™ does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Long Pao™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Riches of Robin reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)