Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mega Joker
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 99.00%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 200×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Horse's Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Jackpot 6000
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 98.90%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mega Joker vs Horse's Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Horse's Treasures does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mega Joker does not publish a rating.
Mega Joker vs Jackpot 6000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 99.00% against 98.90% — Mega Joker is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 200× against 600×, with Jackpot 6000 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mega Joker does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mega Joker returns more in theory over the long run, while Jackpot 6000 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
