Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mermaids™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,007×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Almighty Poseidon Empire
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.09% against 96.19% — Almighty Poseidon Empire is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,007× and 2,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mermaids™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Almighty Poseidon Empire returns more in theory over the long run, while Mermaids™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
