Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mine Blown™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Beach Invaders
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,847×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Midnight Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mine Blown™ vs Beach Invaders
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.15% against 96.09% — Mine Blown™ is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 20,847×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mine Blown™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mine Blown™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Beach Invaders reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Mine Blown™ vs Midnight Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.15% against 96.20%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 20,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mine Blown™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
