Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Ms Robin Hood
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,574×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Burning Desire
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Judgemental
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Ms Robin Hood vs Burning Desire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.19%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ms Robin Hood does not publish a rating.
Ms Robin Hood vs Judgemental
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,574× against 15,000×, with Judgemental higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ms Robin Hood does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
