Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Ms Robin Hood
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,574×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Judgemental
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Tundra's Fortune
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 12,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Ms Robin Hood vs Judgemental
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.19% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,574× against 15,000×, with Judgemental higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ms Robin Hood does not publish a rating.
Ms Robin Hood vs Tundra's Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.19% against 96.04% — Ms Robin Hood is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 12,574× and 12,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Ms Robin Hood does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
