Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mummy™ Megaways™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 16,321×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Space Wars™ Megaways™ XXXtreme
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.16%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 14,400×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Loner
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 14,999×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Mummy™ Megaways™ vs Space Wars™ Megaways™ XXXtreme
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.16%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 16,321× against 14,400×, with Mummy™ Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mummy™ Megaways™ does not publish a rating.
Mummy™ Megaways™ vs Loner
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.06% — Mummy™ Megaways™ is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 16,321× and 14,999×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mummy™ Megaways™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
