Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mummy™ Megaways™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 16,321×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Ankh of Anubis Awakening
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 16,321× and 15,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mummy™ Megaways™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Ankh of Anubis Awakening returns more in theory over the long run, while Mummy™ Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
