Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Narcos™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cash Noire
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Hades Lost Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Narcos™ vs Cash Noire
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.06% — Narcos™ is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Narcos™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Narcos™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Cash Noire reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Narcos™ vs Hades Lost Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.23% against 96.23%.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Narcos™ does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
