Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Nunchucks
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
xWays Hoarder xSplit®
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,030×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Sails of Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Nunchucks vs xWays Hoarder xSplit®
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.21% against 96.14% — Nunchucks is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 12,000× and 11,030×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Nunchucks does not publish a rating.
Nunchucks vs Sails of Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.21% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,000× against 10,000×, with Nunchucks higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Nunchucks does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
