Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.21% against 96.20%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,000× against 10,000×, with Nunchucks higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Nunchucks does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.21% against 96.04% — Nunchucks is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 12,000× and 12,500×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Nunchucks does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Nunchucks returns more in theory over the long run, while Tundra's Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)