Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

NetEnt

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.13% against 96.02% — Pandora’s Treasure™ is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pandora’s Treasure™ does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.13% against 96.20% — Treasures of Kongar is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 10,368× against 15,000×, with Treasures of Kongar higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Pandora’s Treasure™ does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Adventure.

Add to the comparison (up to four)