Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Parthenon: Quest For Immortality™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,600×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Pixies vs Pirates
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,907×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.03% against 95.91% — Parthenon: Quest For Immortality™ is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.6×: 4,600× against 11,907×, with Pixies vs Pirates higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Parthenon: Quest For Immortality™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Parthenon: Quest For Immortality™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Pixies vs Pirates reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
