Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Piggy Bank Farm
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.30%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.30% — Piggy Bank Farm is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.1×: 10,300× against 5,000×, with Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Piggy Bank Farm returns more in theory over the long run, while Piggy Riches 3: Hog Heaven reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
