Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pirates Party™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,046×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Music & party
VS
Rosy Orbit Treasure Turn
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 6,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Laced
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pirates Party™ vs Rosy Orbit Treasure Turn
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.17% against 96.20%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 3,046× against 6,000×, with Rosy Orbit Treasure Turn higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pirates Party™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Pirates Party™ vs Laced
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Laced does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pirates Party™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
