Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pyramid: Quest for Immortality™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,700×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Adventure
VS
Diamonds Of Egypt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt, Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.48% against 96.49%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 1,700× against 2,500×, with Diamonds Of Egypt higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pyramid: Quest for Immortality™ does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
