Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
RAGE
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,800×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
3rd Base
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,114×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Sports
VS
Thrill to Grill
NetEnt
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,900×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
RAGE vs 3rd Base
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.29% — 3rd Base is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,800× against 2,114×, with 3rd Base higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: RAGE does not publish a rating.
RAGE vs Thrill to Grill
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.05%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,800× and 1,900×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: RAGE does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. RAGE returns more in theory over the long run, while Thrill to Grill reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
