Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Rise of Maya™
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.42%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 6,200×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Legacy of Inca
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 6,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.42% against 96.29% — Rise of Maya™ is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,200× and 6,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Rise of Maya™ does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rise of Maya™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Legacy of Inca reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
