Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Robin Hood: Shifting Riches
NetEnt
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,300×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Joker's Jewels Wild
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,420×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — NetEnt and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.75% against 96.58% — Robin Hood: Shifting Riches is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,300× and 1,420×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Robin Hood: Shifting Riches does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Robin Hood: Shifting Riches returns more in theory over the long run, while Joker's Jewels Wild reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
